In California, a property owner or occupier has a duty to maintain safe premises and protect visitors from foreseeable hazards. If the defendant failed to properly maintain the property or allowed dangerous conditions to exist without taking reasonable steps to remedy them, they may be found liable for any resulting injuries. For example, if a store owner fails to clean up a spill or warn customers about a wet floor, the defendant could be considered negligent for not addressing the hazardous condition in a timely manner, thereby creating an unsafe environment for visitors. The standard of care expected depends on the nature of the property and the relationship between the parties (e.g., whether the plaintiff was an invitee, licensee, or trespasser).
To prove that the defendant failed to maintain safe premises, the plaintiff must show that the defendant knew or should have known about the dangerous condition and failed to take appropriate action. This may involve demonstrating that the defendant had notice of the hazard (either actual or constructive), such as through routine inspections or previous incidents involving the same condition. If the defendant was negligent in allowing a dangerous condition to persist or failed to take reasonable measures to protect visitors, they could be found liable for the injuries sustained on their property. However, the plaintiff must also establish that the dangerous condition was the direct cause of the injury and that the injury was foreseeable based on the defendant’s failure to maintain a safe premises.
Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448
How To Schedule A Consultation:
Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].