Did the defendant fail to ensure that his or her vehicle or equipment was safe to use? [California personal injury case]

In a California personal injury case, if the defendant failed to ensure that their vehicle or equipment was safe to use, they may be found liable for negligence if this failure contributed to the plaintiff’s injury. Vehicle and equipment owners, particularly those who use these items in a commercial setting, have a duty to maintain them in safe working condition. This includes regular inspections, repairs, and adherence to safety standards to prevent malfunctions or accidents. For example, if a commercial truck driver fails to inspect the vehicle’s brakes before operation, and an accident occurs because of faulty brakes, the defendant may be held responsible for not ensuring the vehicle was safe for use.

To prove that the defendant’s failure to ensure the safety of their vehicle or equipment caused the plaintiff’s injury, the plaintiff must show that the defendant’s negligence directly contributed to the accident. Evidence might include maintenance records, lack of required inspections, or failure to repair known issues with the vehicle or equipment. If the defendant knew or should have known about the unsafe condition and failed to take action, such as repairing a defective part or conducting a proper inspection, they could be held liable for any injuries resulting from the unsafe condition. In California, a failure to ensure that equipment or vehicles are safe to use may be a clear case of negligence if it directly leads to foreseeable harm.

Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448

How To Schedule A Consultation:

Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].