In a California personal injury case where a driver is found to have been illegally driving in a carpool (HOV) lane without the required number of occupants, this violation can have a significant impact on liability, especially if it contributes to or causes an accident.
🚦 California Law on Carpool (HOV) Lanes
California Vehicle Code § 21655.5 governs the use of High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes. It specifies that:
- Carpool lanes are restricted to vehicles with two or more occupants, unless signs specify otherwise (some may require three).
- Motorcycles, certain low-emission vehicles (with decals), and public transit vehicles are typically exempt.
- Unauthorized use of the HOV lane is a traffic violation and may result in fines.
⚖️ HOV Lane Violations and Personal Injury Liability
Simply driving in an HOV lane illegally does not automatically make a driver liable for a crash. However, if driving in the carpool lane without proper occupancy contributes to or causes an accident, then the violation becomes relevant evidence of negligence.
🔹 Negligence Per Se
If a driver violates a statute (such as the HOV lane rule) and that violation leads to a collision, the doctrine of negligence per se may apply. The plaintiff must show:
- A statute was violated,
- The violation caused the accident,
- The statute was designed to prevent the type of harm that occurred, and
- The plaintiff is within the class of people the law was designed to protect.
For example, if a solo driver uses the carpool lane to speed past stopped traffic, swerves back into a general lane, and causes a rear-end crash, they could be found negligent per se for both misuse of the HOV lane and unsafe lane change.
📚 Relevant Case Scenario
- Driver A is alone in the vehicle but illegally uses the HOV lane during restricted hours.
- Driver B, in a lawful lane, tries to change lanes but is hit by Driver A, who is speeding in the carpool lane to overtake traffic.
- Driver A is cited for illegal HOV use and unsafe driving.
- In this case, Driver A’s violation of HOV laws could be used as evidence of negligence contributing to the accident.
🧾 Key Evidence in Such Cases
To establish fault and support a personal injury claim, the following may be used:
- CHP or police reports: These may cite the HOV violation and note the driver’s occupancy at the time of the crash.
- Dashcam or traffic cam footage: This can show a vehicle improperly using the carpool lane or executing a dangerous maneuver.
- Witness testimony: Other drivers or passengers may confirm that the vehicle in the HOV lane had only one occupant.
- Accident reconstruction experts: Can demonstrate how misuse of the HOV lane contributed to the collision.
- Electronic toll/FasTrak records (if applicable): May provide additional evidence of improper lane use.
🛡️ Possible Defenses
The driver who violated HOV rules might argue:
- Their presence in the carpool lane did not cause the accident.
- The other driver was primarily or solely at fault (e.g., unsafe lane change or failure to yield).
- They had a legal exemption, such as an eligible low-emission vehicle or motorcycle.
In any event, comparative negligence in California means both parties can share fault. A driver illegally in the carpool lane might be found partially at fault, reducing or limiting the damages they can recover if they were injured.
💰 Damages in a Personal Injury Case
If the HOV violator is at fault, the injured party may recover damages such as:
- Medical expenses
- Lost wages
- Pain and suffering
- Property damage
- Loss of earning capacity
✅ Conclusion
Using a carpool lane illegally in California does not, by itself, establish fault in a personal injury case. However, if the violation contributes to or causes a crash, it can serve as strong evidence of negligence, especially under the doctrine of negligence per se.
Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448
How To Schedule A Consultation:
Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].