In a California personal injury case where a patron trips over an empty pallet left in a high-traffic aisle of a store, the situation strongly suggests potential negligence under premises liability law, especially if the pallet was left in a location where it created a foreseeable hazard.
⚖️ Legal Framework – Premises Liability in California
To prevail, the injured person (plaintiff) must prove five elements:
1. Duty of Care
- California law (Civ. Code § 1714) imposes a duty on businesses to keep premises in a reasonably safe condition.
- This includes preventing tripping hazards in high-traffic areas, such as main store aisles.
2. Breach of Duty
- Leaving an empty pallet in a busy aisle, especially unattended and without warning signs, is likely a breach of that duty.
- Courts generally recognize that store owners should not obstruct walkways used by the public.
3. Notice
- The store may be liable if it had:
- Actual knowledge of the pallet’s placement (e.g., a worker left it there), or
- Constructive knowledge (it was there long enough that a reasonable store inspection would have discovered and removed it).
If an employee left the pallet, notice is presumed, and liability is more likely.
4. Causation
- The plaintiff must show that the trip and injury were directly caused by the pallet.
- Strong evidence includes:
- Photographs
- Video footage
- Witness statements
- Incident reports
5. Damages
- Injuries must result in compensable damages, such as:
- Medical expenses
- Lost wages
- Pain and suffering
- Long-term effects, if applicable
📎 Helpful Evidence
- Surveillance footage showing the fall or the pallet’s presence.
- Photos of the pallet in the aisle.
- Store policies on merchandise handling or pallet storage.
- Witnesses confirming the pallet had no warning signs or barriers.
- Employee admissions that pallets are sometimes left out during stocking.
⚠️ Comparative Negligence (Pure Comparative Fault Rule)
- California uses pure comparative negligence.
- If the patron was partially at fault (e.g., distracted, walking fast, not watching the floor), their recovery may be reduced proportionally.
Example: Damages = $80,000. Patron found 25% at fault → Award = $60,000.
🛡️ Store’s Likely Defenses
- The pallet was only there momentarily, and they didn’t have time to move it.
- The hazard was open and obvious, and a reasonable person should have seen it.
- The patron wasn’t paying attention or was in an unauthorized area (e.g., behind restocking barriers, if any).
🕒 Statute of Limitations
- California requires that personal injury claims be filed within 2 years from the date of injury (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1).
✅ Summary
Leaving an empty pallet in a high-traffic aisle without warning signs or barriers is a strong basis for a negligence claim, particularly if:
- The store placed it there or knew it was there, and
- The shopper tripped over it without being warned.
Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448
How To Schedule A Consultation:
Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].