In a California personal injury case where a person is injured in a store-owned parking lot with no visible signage for pedestrians, the case likely falls under premises liability for negligent maintenance or design. The store or property owner may be legally responsible if the lack of pedestrian signage created an unsafe condition that contributed to the injury.
⚖️ Legal Framework – Premises Liability (California Civil Code § 1714)
To prevail, the injured person (plaintiff) must prove:
1. Duty of Care
- Property and business owners have a duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition, including parking lots and walkways.
- This duty includes:
- Designing safe pedestrian routes,
- Posting visible signs or pavement markings to guide pedestrian traffic,
- Separating or clearly defining vehicle vs. pedestrian areas.
2. Breach of Duty
- Failing to post visible pedestrian signage or warnings in a parking lot is likely a breach of the duty to provide a safe environment, especially in high-traffic areas where pedestrians and vehicles regularly interact.
- If the layout of the lot is confusing, unmarked, or forces pedestrians into traffic areas, the business may be liable for creating a foreseeable hazard.
3. Notice – Actual or Constructive Knowledge
- The store can be held liable if it:
- Knew of the danger (actual knowledge), or
- Should have known (constructive knowledge) that the parking lot design was unsafe due to prior complaints, incidents, or industry standards.
4. Causation
- The plaintiff must show that the lack of signage or safe pedestrian paths directly caused or contributed to their injury (e.g., being struck by a car, tripping while avoiding vehicles).
5. Damages
- The plaintiff must show real harm, such as:
- Medical expenses
- Lost income
- Pain and suffering
- Future care or permanent disability, if applicable
🧾 Potentially Liable Parties
- The store or business owner, if they own or control the lot
- The property owner, if different from the business
- A third-party property manager, if responsible for parking lot safety or design
📎 Important Evidence
- Photos or videos of the parking lot showing lack of signage or pedestrian markings
- Surveillance footage (if available)
- Incident report
- Witness testimony
- Prior complaints or accident reports
- Expert opinion on standard parking lot safety design
⚠️ Comparative Negligence (California Rule)
- California follows pure comparative fault. If the injured person was partly at fault (e.g., not using a designated crosswalk, walking while distracted), their damages are reduced accordingly.
Example: $100,000 in damages, plaintiff found 25% at fault → recovery = $75,000
🕒 Statute of Limitations
- 2 years from the date of injury to file a personal injury lawsuit (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1)
- If the parking lot is owned by a government entity, a government claim must be filed within 6 months (Gov. Code § 911.2)
✅ Summary
A person injured in a store-owned parking lot lacking visible pedestrian signage may have a viable premises liability claim if:
- The store failed to provide safe walking routes or signage,
- This created a foreseeable hazard, and
- The injured person suffered documented harm.
Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448
How To Schedule A Consultation:
Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].