Did the Defendant breach duty of care owed to the Plaintiff in California personal injury case?

In California personal injury cases, the defendant is considered to have breached their duty of care if their actions or failure to act fall below the standard expected of a reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances. Breach of duty is determined by evaluating whether the defendant’s conduct was negligent or careless, such as failing to take necessary precautions to prevent foreseeable harm. For example, in a slip-and-fall case, if a store owner neglects to clean up a spill or provide adequate warning signs, this could constitute a breach of the duty to maintain safe premises for customers.

The breach is typically evaluated based on whether the defendant’s actions directly contributed to the plaintiff’s injury. In some cases, the defendant may argue that their conduct was reasonable or that the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by factors outside of their control. However, if the defendant’s actions deviated from what a reasonable person would have done to prevent harm, then it is likely that a breach of duty occurred. The court will consider the foreseeability of the harm, the magnitude of the risk, and whether the defendant’s actions were a proximate cause of the injury in determining whether a breach occurred.

Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448

How To Schedule A Consultation:

Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].