In California personal injury cases, a property owner or occupier has a legal duty to regularly inspect their property for hazards that could pose a risk to visitors. If the defendant failed to inspect the property adequately, and this failure resulted in an injury, the defendant may be found liable under premises liability laws. Regular inspections are part of a property owner’s responsibility to ensure that the premises are safe for guests, employees, or customers. If a hazardous condition, such as a wet floor or a broken handrail, exists and the defendant failed to inspect the area to identify the danger, they could be considered negligent for not addressing the hazard in a timely manner.
To prove that the defendant failed to inspect their property for hazards, the plaintiff must show that the defendant either knew or should have known about the dangerous condition through reasonable inspection procedures. If the defendant did not perform regular inspections or if their inspections were insufficient, leading to the plaintiff’s injury, the defendant could be held responsible. For example, if a store owner does not inspect the aisles for spills or debris, and a customer slips as a result, the plaintiff may argue that the defendant’s failure to inspect contributed to the dangerous condition. Ultimately, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the lack of inspection directly contributed to the injury and that a proper inspection would have identified and corrected the hazard.
Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448
How To Schedule A Consultation:
Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].