In California personal injury cases involving motor vehicle accidents, a defendant’s violation of traffic laws and regulations can play a significant role in establishing negligence. Traffic laws are designed to protect public safety, and when a defendant breaks these laws, such as running a red light, speeding, or failing to yield the right of way, it is often seen as evidence of negligent behavior. In some cases, the violation of these laws may be considered negligence per se, meaning that the defendant’s violation of a traffic law automatically establishes negligence, without the need for further proof of carelessness. For example, if a driver runs a red light and causes an accident, their failure to obey traffic laws is a clear violation that could lead to liability for any resulting injuries.
The violation of traffic laws also helps establish proximate cause in personal injury cases, as the defendant’s unlawful conduct directly contributes to the plaintiff’s injuries. In California, the court will typically examine whether the defendant’s violation was a foreseeable cause of the plaintiff’s harm. If the defendant’s illegal actions directly caused or contributed to the accident and subsequent injuries, the defendant may be held fully liable. However, the plaintiff still must prove that the violation of traffic laws was a direct cause of their injuries and that the harm was a foreseeable result of the defendant’s conduct. Even if the defendant violated traffic laws, the plaintiff must demonstrate a clear connection between the violation and the injury sustained.
Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448
How To Schedule A Consultation:
Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].