In California, if you were injured due to a loose or wobbly handrail, you may have grounds for a premises liability claim. Property owners and managers are legally obligated to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition and to address hazards, including defective or unstable handrails.
Legal Framework: Premises Liability and Building Codes
Under California law, property owners can be held liable for injuries resulting from hazardous conditions on their premises if:
- Ownership or Control: The defendant owned, leased, occupied, or controlled the property where the injury occurred.
- Negligence: The defendant was negligent in the use or maintenance of the property, including failing to address unsafe conditions such as a loose or wobbly handrail.
- Harm: You suffered harm as a result of the unsafe condition.
- Causation: The defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing your harm.
In the case of a loose or wobbly handrail, the property owner may be liable if they knew or should have known about the hazard and failed to take appropriate action to address it. This includes not only repairing the handrail but also ensuring that it complies with relevant building codes.
California’s building codes, such as the California Residential Code (CRC) and Title 25 regulations, require handrails on stairways with four or more risers. These regulations specify dimensions, projections, and other safety features to ensure the safety of individuals using the stairs .
Relevant Case Law
California courts have addressed liability in cases involving defective handrails:
- Brantley v. Pisaro (1996): The court held that just because a tenant did not notice anything about the handrail which led him to believe it might have been defective does not prove there was no defect in the handrail. The prior uneventful use by the tenant may mean only that the condition did not manifest itself at an earlier time. The court emphasized that the absence of earlier accidents does not establish the absence of a defect .Findlaw+1Justia Law+1Justia Law
- Devens v. Goldberg: The court found that the defendant’s failure to inspect a wooden railing, which had been in place for at least six years without inspection, was evidence of negligence. The court noted that wooden structures are liable to get out of repair and that the exercise of care is necessary to guard against wear and tear .Justia Law
- Yazzolino v. Jones: The court held that the property owner could be held liable for injuries resulting from a defective railing if they had actual or constructive notice of the defect and failed to repair it. The court emphasized the duty of ordinary care in relation to common areas, including keeping the premises safe and requiring reasonably careful inspection at reasonable intervals to learn of dangers not apparent to the eye .Justia Law
Steps to Take After an Injury
If you have been injured due to a loose or wobbly handrail, consider the following steps:
- Seek Medical Attention: Promptly seek medical care for your injuries and keep records of all treatments.
- Report the Incident: Inform the property owner or manager about the hazard and document the report.
- Gather Evidence: Collect photographs of the handrail and the surrounding area, and obtain contact information for any witnesses.
- Consult an Attorney: Contact a personal injury attorney experienced in premises liability cases to evaluate your situation and guide you through the legal process.
Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448
How To Schedule A Consultation:
Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].