In California personal injury cases, rubbernecking — the act of slowing down to look at an accident scene — is a common contributing factor in rear-end collisions and multi-vehicle pileups. These cases involve complex issues of negligence and comparative fault, especially when multiple drivers are involved.
🔍 Legal Overview: Rubbernecking and Negligence
1. Duty to Maintain Safe Speed & Distance
Under California Vehicle Code § 22350 (Basic Speed Law), drivers must travel at a speed that is safe for conditions — including traffic flow.
Under Vehicle Code § 21703, drivers must not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent.
👉 Slowing down abruptly or unnecessarily (such as rubbernecking) without reason may violate these duties and be considered negligent driving.
2. Driver Distraction and Inattention
Rubbernecking can also constitute a form of distracted driving, which is grounds for negligence. Even if there’s a legitimate reason to slow down, failing to keep proper lookout or control of the vehicle may still create liability.
🧷 Liability in a Chain Reaction or Rear-End Collision
📌 Rubbernecking Driver
- If a driver slows down excessively to look at an accident scene and causes a chain-reaction crash, they may be considered at fault or partially at fault for the crash.
📌 Trailing Driver(s)
- Still have a duty to maintain a safe following distance, even if traffic ahead slows unexpectedly.
- Could be partially at fault if they failed to respond appropriately to traffic slowing due to the incident.
⚖️ Comparative Negligence in California
California follows pure comparative fault. This means:
- Each party involved in the accident is assigned a percentage of fault.
- Compensation is reduced by the percentage of the plaintiff’s fault.
Example:
- Rubbernecking driver: 70% at fault
- Trailing driver (who rear-ended them): 30% at fault
- Plaintiff awarded $100,000 → will receive $70,000 after reduction for own fault
🧾 Evidence That Helps
To build a strong case:
- Dashcam footage showing the moment of impact and traffic flow
- Traffic camera or CCTV if available
- Witness statements confirming distracted behavior (e.g., staring at accident scene)
- Police reports noting slowed traffic due to rubbernecking
- Expert accident reconstruction to show deceleration patterns
🛑 Defenses That May Arise
- Unavoidable slow-down due to congestion
- Emergency stop to avoid debris or emergency responders
- No time to react due to preceding vehicle’s abrupt braking
✅ Conclusion
Rubbernecking is a form of negligent driving if it causes unsafe slowdowns or inattention to traffic. In California personal injury cases, this behavior can lead to shared liability in multi-car accidents, especially rear-end collisions. However, each driver’s conduct is evaluated under the lens of reasonable care given the conditions.
Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448
How To Schedule A Consultation:
Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].