Was the Defendant engaged in an ultrahazardous activity that resulted in harm in California personal injury case?

In California personal injury cases, if the defendant was engaged in an ultrahazardous activity (also known as a strict liability activity), they may be held liable for any harm caused by that activity, even if they were not negligent. Ultrahazardous activities are those that carry an inherently high risk of harm, regardless of the precautions taken. These activities typically include things like the use of explosives, the transportation of hazardous materials, or operating certain types of machinery. If the defendant was conducting an ultrahazardous activity and the plaintiff’s injury was a direct result of that activity, the defendant can be held strictly liable for the harm, meaning negligence does not need to be proven.

Under California law, strict liability applies to ultrahazardous activities because they pose a significant risk of harm to people or property, even when performed with the utmost care. For example, if a construction company uses explosives to demolish a building and debris injures a nearby person, the company could be held strictly liable for the injury, even if they followed all safety regulations and took precautions. In these cases, the focus is on the dangerous nature of the activity itself, not on the defendant’s behavior. The plaintiff must prove that the injury resulted from the defendant’s engagement in the ultrahazardous activity and that the harm was within the scope of risks associated with that activity.

Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448

How To Schedule A Consultation:

Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].