In California personal injury cases, if the defendant fails to warn the plaintiff of known risks, and that failure leads to harm, the defendant may be held liable for negligence. A property owner, business, or even an individual has a duty to warn others of foreseeable dangers that they know or should know about, especially if the plaintiff is unaware of the risk. For example, if a store owner knows about a wet floor or a hazardous area but fails to place a warning sign or take action to correct the condition, and the plaintiff slips and falls as a result, the defendant’s failure to warn is a key factor in determining liability. The court will assess whether a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would have recognized the risk and taken steps to prevent harm.
To establish that the failure to warn caused harm, the plaintiff must prove that the lack of warning directly led to the injury. The plaintiff must show that, had they been properly warned, they would have avoided the risk and prevented the harm. This could involve demonstrating that the defendant knew of the risk or should have known about it, and that the plaintiff’s injury was a foreseeable result of not being informed. In some cases, the plaintiff may also show that the defendant’s conduct was particularly egregious, such as failing to warn about a hidden or exceptionally dangerous hazard that could not be reasonably noticed by the plaintiff.
Law Offices of James R. Dickinson – 909-848-8448
How To Schedule A Consultation:
Please call us at 909-848-8448 to schedule a free consultation/case evaluation or complete the form immediately below. [Please note certain formalities must be completed to retain the Law Offices of James R. Dickinson, such as the signing of a legal fee agreement [see “Disclaimers”]].